Resistors in parallel
Components are in parallel if they share two nodes, like this,
We reveal the properties of the parallel connection by looking at resistor circuits. Figuring out parallel resistors is a little trickier than series resistors.
Written by Willy McAllister.
Contents
- The parallel connection
- Resistors in parallel
- Equivalent parallel resistor
- $\text N$ resistors in parallel
- Current distributes between resistors in parallel
- Concept check
- Special case — $2$ resistors in parallel
- Special case — $2$ equal resistors in parallel
The parallel connection
Components are in parallel when their two terminals connect to the same nodes.
In the following image, $\text R1$, $\text R2$, and $\text R3$ are in parallel. The two horizontal lines represent the two nodes shared by all three resistors.
Review the definition of a node
Review the definitions of node and a distributed node in this article on Circuit terminology. Another good resource to help you understand parallel circuits is this article on Schematic equivalence.
Because the resistors are connected to the same nodes, the same voltage appears across each parallel resistor.
The resistors in the following image are not in parallel. There are extra components (orange boxes) breaking up the common nodes between resistors. This circuit has four separate nodes, so $\text R1$, $\text R2$, and $\text R3$ do not share the same voltage.
Resistors in parallel
Here is a circuit with resistors in parallel. This circuit has a current source. We don’t get to use those very often, so this should be fun.
Current source $\text I_\text s$ is driving current $i$ toward $\text R1$, $\text R2$, and $\text R3$. Current $i$ returns to the bottom terminal of the current source. but we don’t yet know the voltage $v$ or how $i$ splits up into the three resistor currents.
The things we know are,
- Current $i$ is some given constant value.
- The currents in the three resistor have to add up to $i$.
- Voltage $v$ appears across all three resistors.
With just this little bit of knowledge, and Ohm’s Law, we can find the things we don’t know,
- We don’t yet know voltage $v$ appearing across the resistors and current source.
- We don’t know how $i$ splits up into the three resistor currents.
Using what we know, we can write these expressions,
$i = i_{\text R1} + i_{\text R2} + i_{\text R3} $
$v = i_{\text R1} \, \text R1 \qquad v = i_{\text R2} \, \text R2 \qquad v = i_{\text R3} \, \text R3$
Rearrange the three Ohm’s Law expressions to solve for current,
$i_{\text R1} = \dfrac{v}{\text R1} \qquad i_{\text R2} = \dfrac{v}{\text R2} \qquad i_{\text R3} = \dfrac{v}{\text R3}$
Substitute these expressions into the sum of currents,
$i = \dfrac{v}{\text R1} +\dfrac{v}{\text R2} + \dfrac{v}{\text R3}$
Factor out the common term $v$,
$i = v \left (\dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} + \dfrac{1}{\text R3} \right )$
Remember we already know $i$ (it set by the current source), so we can solve for $v$,
$v = i \,\dfrac{1}{\left (\dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} + \dfrac{1}{\text R3} \right )}$
Take a look at this equation. It looks just like Ohm’s Law, $v = i\,\text R$, but with the resistors appearing as a big double-reciprocal expression where $\text R$ usually appears.
We conclude,
For resistors in parallel the overall resistance is the reciprocal of the sum of reciprocals of the individual resistors.
(This is a mouthful. It’s easier to understand the equation than to say it out loud.)
Equivalent parallel resistor
The previous equation suggests a way to define a new resistor equivalent to the three parallel resistors.
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1}{\left (\dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} + \dfrac{1}{\text R3} \right )}$
The new resistor is the reciprocal of the sum of reciprocals. It is equivalent in the sense that, for a given $i$ flowing from the current source, the same voltage $v$ appears.
We can write this a little smaller by flipping the giant reciprocal,
$\dfrac{1}{\text R_{\text{parallel}}} = \dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} + \dfrac{1}{\text R3}$
You can replace the three parallel resistors with a single equivalent resistor and $i$ and $v$ stay exactly the same.
From the “viewpoint” of the current source, you can’t tell the difference between the equivalent resistor and the three parallel resistors.
$\text N$ resistors in parallel
We can generalize the parallel resistor equation for any number of resistors in parallel. The derivation of this formula for $\text N$ resistors in parallel follows exactly the same steps we did above for three resistors in parallel.
$\dfrac{1}{\text R_{\text{parallel}}} = \dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} + \ldots + \dfrac{1}{\text{R}_\text N}$
$\qquad\quad$
Current distributes between resistors in parallel
Let’s figure out how the main current $i$ splits up and flows through each resistor. We are looking for $i_{\text R1}$, $i_{\text R2}$, and $i_{\text R3}$.
Apply Ohm’s Law to the individual resistors. $v$ is the same in each equation,
$i_{\text R1} = v/\text R_1 \qquad i_{\text R2} = v/\text R_2 \qquad i_{\text R3} = v/\text R_3$
The main current $i$ splits up into three separate currents. Those currents rejoin and flow back to the current source. That means the individual resistor currents have to add up to the main current.
The amount of current in each resistor is inversely proportional to the value of the resistor.
This will sink in better if we do an example with real numbers.
Concept check
PROBLEM 1
a. Find voltage $v$.
b. Find the currents in the three resistors.
c. Show how the individual resistor currents add up to $i$.
The steps to a solution are,
- Find the equivalent parallel resistance $\text R_{\text{parallel}}$.
- Find voltage $v$ using Ohm’s Law.
- Find the individual currents, again using Ohm’s Law.
- Verify the resistor currents add up to what they should.
Show answer
Part a. The equivalent $\text R_{\text{parallel}}$ is equal to the reciprocal of the reciprocal sum of the three resistors.
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1}{\left (\dfrac{1}{50\,\Omega} + \dfrac{1}{100\,\Omega} + \dfrac{1}{500\,\Omega} \right )}$
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1}{(0.02 + 0.01 + 0.002)} = \dfrac{1}{0.032} = 31.25\,\Omega$
Now we know the current and equivalent resistance. We can solve for voltage $v$ across all the resistors using Ohm’s Law,
$v = i\,\text R_{\text{parallel}}$
$v = 100\,\text{mA} \cdot 31.25\,\Omega = 3.125\,\text V$
Part b. Knowing $v$ we can go back and compute the individual resistor currents,
$i_{\text R1} = \dfrac{v}{\text R1} = \dfrac{3.125\,\text V}{\text{50}} = 62.5\,\text{mA}$
$i_{\text R2} = \dfrac{v}{\text R2} = \dfrac{3.125\,\text V}{\text{100}} = 31.25\,\text{mA}$
$i_{\text R3} = \dfrac{v}{\text R3} = \dfrac{3.125\,\text V}{\text{500}} = \phantom{0}6.25\,\text{mA}$
Here is what the solution looks like,
Part c. Check: Do the resistor currents add up to the source current?
$62.5\,\text{mA} + 31.25\,\text{mA} + 6.25\,\text{mA} = 100\,\text{mA}\qquad \checkmark$ Yes!
How do electrons “know” which resistor to flow through?
A common question about parallel circuits is, “When the current reaches the first resistor, how do the electrons ‘choose’ or ‘know’ which resistor to flow through?”, or “How do the electrons ‘decide’ where to flow?”
As you know, electrons are not people, they don’t have little electron brains (as far as we know). There is no choosing or deciding involved. They don’t choose or decide which resistor to flow through any more than a water molecule ‘decides’ or ‘choses’ which side of a rock it will flow past in a stream. In any circuit, including parallel circuits, each electron responds only to electric forces from voltage and from the repelling swarm of surrounding electrons.
Based on the resistor currents you just found,
PROBLEM 2
The largest share of current goes through which resistor?
Choose one: $\quad$ smallest $\quad$ middle $\quad$ largest
show answer
The smallest resistor carries the largest share of current.
PROBLEM 3
The smallest share of current goes through which resistor?
Choose one: $\quad$ smallest $\quad$ middle $\quad$ largest
show answer
The largest resistor carries the smallest share of current.
PROBLEM 4
What is the relative size of the equivalent resistor compared to the parallel resistors?
- $\text{R}_\text{parallel}$ is larger than the largest resistor.
- $\text{R}_\text{parallel}$ is between the largest and smallest resistor.
- $\text{R}_\text{parallel}$ is smaller than the smallest resistor.
show answer
The equivalent parallel resistor is smaller than the smallest parallel resistor. Always.
Problem 5
Which resistor has the highest voltage?
Choose one: $\quad$ smallest $\quad$ middle $\quad$ largest
show answer
Trick question. All three resistors have the same voltage. That’s what it means to be in parallel. They all share the same voltage.
Special case — $2$ resistors in parallel
From the general equation, two resistors in parallel have an equivalent resistance of,
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1} {\left (\dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} \right )}$
We can do a bit of algebra to come up with an alternative expression with just one fraction. Rather than just telling you the answer, it is a rite of passage to work through the algebra yourself the first time. The answer is tucked away so you can try this on your own before peeking. See if you can derive an expression for $\text R_{\text{parallel}}$ in the form of a single fraction.
Two resistors in parallel
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1} {\left (\dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} \right )}$
Work on the denominator to clear the fractions. The common denominator is $\text R1 \, \text R2$.
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1}{\left (\dfrac{1}{\text R1}\,\dfrac{\text R2}{\text R2}\right ) + \left (\dfrac{1}{\text R2}\,\dfrac{\text R1}{\text R1} \right )}$
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1} {\left ( \dfrac{\text R2}{\text R1\,\text R2} \right ) + \left (\dfrac{\text R1}{\text R1\,\text R2} \right )}$
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1} {\left (\dfrac{\text R1 + \text R2}{\text R1\,\text R2} \right )}$
Flip over the big fraction to get the equation for two resistors in parallel,
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = {\dfrac{\text R1\,\text R2} {\text R1 + \text R2}}$
The product over the sum. This is worth memorizing.
Special case — $2$ equal resistors in parallel
What if the two resistors in parallel have the same value. What is the equivalent $\text R_{\text{parallel}}$?
Let $\text R1 = \text R2$. We will call it just $\text R$.
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{\text R \, \text R}{\text R + \text R} = \dfrac{\text R \, \text R}{2\,\text R}$
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{1}{2} \,\text R$
Two identical resistors in parallel have an equivalent resistance exactly half the value of either resistor. The current splits equally between the two.
Summary
Components in parallel share the same voltage.
The general form for resistors in parallel is,
$\dfrac{1}{\text R_{\text{parallel}}} = \dfrac{1}{\text R1} +\dfrac{1}{\text R2} + \ldots + \dfrac{1}{\text{R}_\text N} $
Use this equation if you have three or more resistors in parallel.
If you have two parallel resistors you can use the general form or you can combine them as the product over the sum,
$\text R_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{\text R1\,\text R2}{\text R1+\text R2}$
The equivalent resistor $\text R_{\text{parallel}}$ is always smaller than the smallest parallel resistor.
The largest current flows through the smallest resistor.
Questions
I’m a little lost regarding the beginning of this lesson where the sum of individual currents in a parallel circuit at each node (or before each resistor) equals the total current in the circuit. How do we know this (maybe I missed it in a previous lesson?) If, in the first parallel resistor circuit example above, these are distributed node before R1, R2, R3, and distributed nodes are really just a single node, what is causing the current to change? The resistors or the node(s)? Lost!!
Hi Robert, Tip: When thinking about how the current splits up between the three resistors, think about currents in the resistors. Avoid trying to figure out the currents flowing in the little line segments of the distributed nodes above and below the resistors. The currents in those little wire segments will always mess up your mind (because you can draw the resistors in a different order and the little segment currents will be different). However, the currents in the resistors will always stay the same.
The way to visualize current splitting up in parallel resistors is to imagine water flowing in a creek. Draw a line across the creek, from bank to bank. Place two rocks in the creek on the line, with gaps between them. That creates three channels for water to flow through. Those channels are the resistors. All the water flowing from upstream reaches the rocks and splits up to go through the channels. All the water makes it through the gaps and rejoins on the downstream side of the rocks. If you add up the total gallons/minute in the three channels, it will exactly equal the current upstream (Is) and downstream.
This article may help clear up my point about currents in a distributed node: http://spinningnumbers.org/a/schematic-equivalence.html