In this worked example we use source transformation to simplify a circuit.

Source transformation is explained here.

Written by Willy McAllister.

## Review

Source transformation between Thévenin and Norton forms,

• The resistor value is the same for the Thévenin and Norton forms, $\text R_\text T = \text R_\text N$.

• Convert Thévenin to Norton: set $\text I_\text N = \text V_\text T / \text R_\text T$.

• Convert Norton to Thévenin: set $\text V_\text T = \text I_\text N \, \text R_\text N$.

Thévenin and Norton forms are equivalent because they have the same $i$-$v$ behavior from the viewpoint of the output port.

## General strategy

Think about source transformation when the problem asks you about a single voltage or current for one specific component. Everything besides that one component is a candidate for source transformation.

The One Rule is,
Don’t include the component with the requested $i$ or $v$ in a source transformation.

The strategy,

• Read the problem carefully. Identify what is asked for.
• Scan the circuit. Look for the familiar pattern of the two forms,
• Thévenin form is a voltage source in series with a resistor.
• Norton form is a current source in parallel with a resistor.
• Pick candidates for source transformation. Remember the One Rule.
• Purpose: transform a source to increase the number of resistors in series or in parallel.
• Simplify the circuit: merge those resistors into their series or parallel equivalent.
• Redraw the circuit and look for another chance to transform sources.
• Solve for the asked-for variable in the simpler circuit.

## Example

Find $\blueD i$.

We could go after this circuit with methods we’ve learned before, like Node Voltage or Mesh Current. But this time we will do it with source transformation.

What is asked for?

We are asked to find $\blueD i$ in $\text R1$, the $470 \,\Omega$ resistor.

Are there any Thévenin or Norton forms?

Yes, one of each.
The voltage source with $\text R1$ is a Thévenin form.
The current source with $\text R2$ is a Norton form.

The two little port circles split the forms, but they won’t be there in your circuit problems.

Which ones are candidates for source transformation?

The Norton form on the right is a candidate for transformation.

From the One Rule, the Thévenin form on the left is not a candidate for transformation. That’s because we’ve been asked to find the current in $\text R1$. We must not disturb that component if we want to get the right answer.

Anticipate: What good thing would happen if we did a source transformation?

If we transform the Norton form we'll end up with the two resistors in series. That creates the opportunity to simplify.

Do the source transformation and redraw the circuit.

$\text R2 =$ ________
$\text V2 =$ ________

Transform the Norton form to the equivalent Thévenin form.

$\text R2$ is the same for both. $\text R2 = 330\,\Omega$.

The Thévenin voltage sources is $\text V2 = \text I2 \cdot \text R2 = 2\,\text{mA} \cdot 330\,\Omega = 0.66\,\text V$

Is it a good idea to try another transformation?

Not really. Current $i$ flows through $\text R1$. Anything else we try would involve touching $\text R1$, which would violate the One Rule.

Simplify and find $i$.

Source transformation gives us two resistors in series. The voltage across the series resistors is $\text V1 - \text V2$. Ohm’s Law gives us,

$i = \dfrac{\text V1 - \text V2}{(\text R1 + \text R2)}$

$i = \dfrac{3.3 - 0.66}{(470 + 330)} = \dfrac{2.64}{800}$

$i = 3.3\,\text{mA}$

## Simulation model

Simulation model. Open the link in another tab. The top circuit is the Example. Click on DC in the menu bar to perform a DC analysis.

### Design challenge

The bottom circuit shows the Norton to Thévenin source transformation, but $\text R2\text b$ and $\text V2$ don’t have the right values. You have to fix them!

Double-click on $\text R2\text b$ and $\text V2$ and fill in the Thévenin equivalent values you calculated above. Then run another DC analysis. Is $i$ the same in both schematics?

Here’s the circuit with the correct values filled in, show answer.

### Things to notice

• $\text R1$ and $\text R1\text b$ have the same current and the same voltage. That is what it means to be equivalent.
• The current in $\text V2$ is not the same as current $\text I2$. That’s okay. Our focus is on the current and voltage for $\text R1$ and $\text R1\text b$.
• Is source transformation easier or harder than analyzing by Node Voltage or Mesh Current methods? What do you think? Source transformation simplified the circuit down to something we could solve with one application of Ohm’s Law. Think about how you would solve this circuit with either Node Voltage or Mesh Current.

In the next article we learn how to simplify complex networks of many $\text R$’s and sources down to a Thévenin equivalent or Norton equivalent.